We don't want to think of Christians opposing one another, but it happens. It even occurred among early church leaders. In Galatians 2, we see Paul opposing Peter "to his face." Wow...what an upstart!

Seriously, Paul had his reasons. Take a look at the “why” and “how” of this opposition:

Paul opposed Peter to his face. He didn't hide by telling others about his dissatisfaction with Peter. He went right to him. That's much bolder than the easier approach of gossip or attacking someone by hiding behind a Facebook screen or sending a nasty reply by email.

Paul had a valid reason. Peter had acted inconsistently by eating with Gentiles until certain others were around. Then Peter pulled back, appearing to be afraid of what others may think. (That would be in line with Peter's personality.) Peter acted out of fear and Paul confronted him on it. This was not just about some personal preference Paul had. This was about Peter sending a mixed message to the young Christian Gentiles whom he appeared to be withdrawing from when Jewish Christians were around.

Paul saw how Peter’s actions had negative effect on others. Paul could see the damage to others on the ministry team. He mentioned that others joined in the hypocrisy and that even Barnabas, who was known for his skills of encouragement, was led astray by Peter’s example. Again, this wasn't just a personality conflict. This was concern for the impact Peter's behavior had on others.

Paul confronted publicly. Normally, it is best to approach a person privately and the Bible even teaches that in Matthew 18. But in this case, Peter's actions were influencing an entire team and were observed by the public, essentially. Thus, Paul chose to confront Peter in public. In this case, it was a wise choice so there would not be a "he said/she said" situation. Also, Peter, as a leader, had a deeper responsibility for his actions due to those looking to him for guidance. It affected more than just Peter and Paul.

Paul asked a question. Paul started with a statement about the behavior and immediately asked "How is it then you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs?" Asking questions is almost always the better approach than simply attacking. Drawing out feelings and opinions can lead to more understanding.

Paul reminded Peter of the truth. Paul goes on to remind Peter of his--and all the team's--identity in Christ. He used a theological basis to exhort Peter, not his own opinion of what Peter should do.

We aren’t told any specifics of how Peter reacted to Paul's exhortation that day. History indicates though that Peter defended Paul at the Jerusalem council, which is thought to have occurred after this. (Source: bible.org) They both had strong personalities and there very well could have been “agreement to disagree” about some things. But the key is they both knew Christ as Savior and knew their callings. Even if they weren’t “buddy buddy,” they were still being used by God and did not appear to let their differences have a major impact on their walk with Him or ministry for Him.

How do you respond when someone criticizes you, especially if it is another Christian? Print This